home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ccn.cs.dal.ca!ab795
- From: ab795@ccn.cs.dal.ca (James Bet Tee)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Best wordprocessor?
- Date: 18 Jan 1996 06:02:21 GMT
- Organization: Chebucto Community Net
- Message-ID: <4dknpd$gj6@ra.isisnet.com>
- References: <961.6589T1295T2396@uni-muenster.de> <wulfraedDLB61q.o7@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ccn.cs.dal.ca
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Dennis Lee Bieber (wulfraed@kd6mog.netcom.com) wrote:
-
- : First off, I do not look for "drawing tools" and image import
- : capabilities in a WORD-processor. Technically, Scripsit! was a GOOD
- : wordprocessor. excellence! was, for me, a great wordprocessor -- but had
- : terrible output unless run to PostScript. FW has quirks that I find annoying
- <stuff cut>
- : If I need DTP capability, I'll buy a DTP (formerly ProPage, now
- : PageStream).
-
- Granted it's your opinion, but I have to disagree! I really like
- the option of drawing tools at my disposal, and I use it every day in the
- lines of importing EPS diagrams, etc. to include in my group patient case
- reports, youth group newsletters, etc. For someone like me who's a lowly
- student who can't afford to buy 'your' idea of a wordprocessor and then
- also 'buy' a DTP program, FW is the best solution! Since when has
- added goodies been groaned about on the Amiga platform anyway? The
- reverse has certainly been the case for years now...
-
-
- -James
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- James Tee _ // AMIGA University of Toronto
- ab795@ccn.cs.dal.ca \X/ Orbital - "Remind" Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Homepage: http://ccn.cs.dal.ca/~ab795/Profile.html
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- W L ERA G GS SV IP H R ER HR BB SO
- David Cone 9 2 3.82 13 13 0 99.0 82 42 42 12 47 89
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-